Area or population, no doubt, make a country big. But these factors don’t make a
nation great. It is character that makes a nation great. Great nations
demonstrate the moral courage to keep their word. India has to ponder whether it
has fulfilled the commitments made by its leaders, like late Mahatama Gandhi,
Jawahar Lal Nehru and others, to hold plebiscite in the State of Jammu &
Kashmir. The whole world knows, they haven’t.
Now when India is aspiring for a permanent slot in the UN Security Council,
India should think seriously whether it really qualifies for that, because it
has not only reneged on the promises it made on Jammu & Kashmir but has also
defied with impunity the resolutions of the UN Security Council on Kashmir, the
same body in which India desires a permanent seat. If India is interested to
play its role at the international level, it should, in the first instance,
amicably resolve all pending issues with its neighbours, including the issue of
Jammu & Kashmir, so that India may emerge as a peace loving nation.
MAHATAMA GANDHI
-
“If the people of Kashmir are in favour of opting for Pakistan, no
power on earth can stop them from doing so. They should be left free to decide
for themselves”.
(Speech at Prayer Meeting, 26th October, 1947. Complete Works of Mahatama Gandhi)
LORD MOUNTBATTEN, GOVERNOR GENERAL OF INDIA
- “The question of the state’s accession should be settled by a
reference to the people”.
(Letter to Maharaja of Jammu & Kashmir, 27th
October, 1947)
JAWAHARLAL NEHRU, PRIME MINISTER OF INDIA
- “Our view which we have repeatedly made public is that the question
of accession in any disputed territory or State must be decided in accordance
with wishes of people and we adhere to this view”.
(Telegram to British and Pakistani Prime
Ministers, 27th October, 1947)
-
“In regard to accession also, it has been made clear that this is
subject to reference to people of State and their decision”.
(Telegram to Prime Minister of Pakistan, 28th
October, 1947)
-
“Our assurance that we shall withdraw our troops from Kashmir as soon
as peace and order is restored and leave the decision regarding the future of
this State to the people of the State is not merely a promise to your Government
but also to the people of Kashmir and to the world”.
(Telegram to Prime Minister of Pakistan, 31st
October, 1947)
-
“We are anxious not to finalize anything in a moment of crisis and
without the fullest opportunity to be given to the people of Kashmir to have
their say. It is for them ultimately to decide.
“And let me make it clear that it has been our policy all along that
where there is a dispute about the accession of a State to either Dominion, the
accession must be made by the people of the State”.
(Broadcast to the Nation: All India Radio, 2nd
November, 1947)
-
“We have declared that the fate of Kashmir is ultimately to be
decided by the people. The pledge we have given not only to the people of
Kashmir but to the world. We will not and can not back out of it”.
(Statement in New Delhi: All India Radio, 3rd
November, 1947)
-
“…….Where the State has not acceded to that Dominion whose majority
community is the same as State’s, the question whether State has finally acceded
to one or other Dominion should be ascertained by reference to the will of
people”.
(Telegram to Prime Minister of Pakistan, 8th
November, 1947)
-
“Kashmir should decide question of accession by plebiscite or
referendum under international auspices such as those of the United Nations”.
(Letter to Prime Minister of Pakistan, 21st
November, 1947)
-
“In order to establish our bonafides, we have suggested that when the
people are given the chance to decide their future, this should be done under
the supervision of an impartial tribunal such as the United Nations Organisation.
The issue in Kashmir is whether violence and naked force should decide the
future or the will of the people”.
(Statement in Indian Constituent Assembly, 25th
November, 1947)
-
“…. I confess, however, that I find myself unable to suggest anything
beyond what I have offered already, namely, to ask UNO to send impartial
observers to advise us regarding the plebiscite”.
(Telegram to Prime Minister of Pakistan, 12th
December, 1947)
- “Even at the moment of accession, we went out of our way to make a
unilateral declaration that we would abide by the will of the people of Kashmir
as declared in a plebiscite or referendum. We insisted further that the
Government of Kashmir must immediately become a popular government. We have
adhered to that position throughout and we are prepared to have a plebiscite,
with every protection for fair voting, and to abide by the decision of the
people of Kashmir”.
“……Ultimately there is no doubt in my mind that, in Kashmir as
elsewhere, the people of Kashmir will decide finally, and all that we wish is
that they should have freedom of decision without any external compulsion”.
(Statement in Constituent Assembly of India, 5th
March, 1948)
-
“It has always been our view that, in the event of a plebiscite, the
people of Kashmir should decide their future for themselves”.
(Telegram to UN Representative for India and Pakistan, 16th August, 1950)
-
“…..We all agreed that it is the people of Kashmir who must decide for
themselves about their future externally or internally. It is an obvious fact
that, even without our agreement, no country is going to hold on to Kashmir
against the will of the Kashmiris”.
(Press Conference in London, 16th
January, 1951, reported in The Statesman, New Delhi on 18th
January, 1951)
-
“We had given our pledge to the people of Kashmir and subsequently to
the United Nations; we stood by it and we stand by it today. Let the people of
Kashmir decide”.
(Statement in Indian Parliament, 12th
February, 1951)
-
“First of all, I would like to remind you of the fateful days of 1947
when I came to Srinagar and gave the solemn assurance that the people of India
would stand by Kashmir in her struggle. On that assurance, I shook Sheikh
Abdullah’s hand before the vast multitude that had gathered there. I want to
repeat that the Government of India will stand by that pledge, whatever happens.
That pledge itself stated that it is for the people of Kashmir to decide their
fate without external interference. That assurance also remains and will
continue”.
(Address at public meeting in Srinagar, 4th
June, 1951)
- “People seem to forget that Kashmir is not a commodity for sale or to
be bartered. It has an individual existence and its people must be the final
arbiters of their future”.
(Report to All-India Congress Committee,
reported in The Statesman, New Delhi, 9th July, 1951)
- “We have taken the issue to the United Nations and given our word of
for a peaceful solution …….. As a great nation, we can not go back on it. We
have left the question for final solution to the people of Kashmir and we are
determined to abide by their decision”.
(Statement reported in Amrita Bazar Patrika,
Calcutta, 2nd January, 1952)
- “India is a great country and Kashmir is almost in the heart of Asia.
There is an enormous difference not only geographically but in all kinds of
facts there. Do you think (in dealing with Kashmir) you are dealing with a part
of U.P or Bihar or Gujrat?”
(Statement in Indian Parliament, 26th
June, 1952)
- “I want to stress that it is only the people of Kashmir who can decide
the future of Kashmir. It is not that we have merely said that to the United
Nations and to the people of Kashmir; it is our conviction and one that is borne
out by the policy that we have pursued, not only in Kashmir but everywhere.
Though these five years have meant a lot of trouble and expense and in spite of
all we have done we would willingly leave Kashmir if it was made clear to us
that the people of Kashmir wanted us to go. However sad we may feel about
leaving. We are not going to stay against the wishes of the people. We are not
going to stay against the wishes of the people. We are not going to impose
ourselves on them at the point of the bayonet.
“I started with the presumption that it is for the people of Kashmir
to decide their own future. We will not compel them. In that sense, the people
of Kashmir are sovereign”.
(Statement in Indian Parliament, 7th
August, 1952)
- “The most feasible method of ascertaining the wishes of the people was
by fair and impartial plebiscite”.
(Joint communiqué of the Prime Ministers of India and Pakistan issued in Delhi after their meeting on 20th August, 1953)
-
“As a result of the plebiscite over the entire state, we would be in a
position to consider the matter, so that the final decision should cause the
least disturbance and should take into consideration geographical, economic and
other important factors.
“I should like to make it clear that there is no intention on my
part to exclude the UN from this question of Kashmir.
(Letter to Prime Minister of Pakistan, 3rd
September, 1953)
- “Our object is to give freedom to the people of Kashmir to decide
their future in a peaceful way so as to create no upset, as we said in our joint
statement”.
(Letter to Prime Minister of Pakistan, 10th
November, 1953)
- “India will stand by her international commitments on the Kashmir
issue and implement them at the appropriate time.
“The repudiation of international commitments would lower India’s
prestige abroad”.
(Statement reported in The Time of India, 16th
May, 1954)
- “But so far as the Government of India are concerned, every assurance
and international commitment in regard to Kashmir stands”.
(Statement in Indian Council of States, 18th
May, 1954)
- “Kashmir is not a thing to be bandied about between India and Pakistan
but it has a soul of its own and an individuality of its own. Nothing can be
done without the goodwill and consent of the people of Kashmir”.
(Statement in Indian Parliament, 31st
March, 1955)
- “The people of Kashmir would be free to decide their future by the
recognized democratic method of plebiscite or referendum, which in order to
ensure complete impartiality may be held under international auspices.”
(Letter from Government of India to UN, 31st
December, 1947)
-
“In accepting the accession they [the Government of India] refused to
take advantage of the immediate peril in which the State found itself and
informed the Ruler that the accession should finally be settled by plebiscite as
soon as peace had been restored. They have subsequently made it quite clear that
they are agreeable to the plebiscite being conducted if necessary under
international auspices.
“On the question of accession, the Government of India has always
enunciated the policy that in all cases of dispute the people of the State
concerned should make the decision.
“We have no further interest, and we have agreed that a plebiscite
in Kashmir might take place under international auspices after peace and order
have been established.
“We desire only to see peace restored in Kashmir and ensure that the
people of Kashmir are left free to decide in an orderly and peaceful manner the
future of their state. We have no further interest, and we have agreed that a
plebiscite in Kashmir might take place under international auspices after peace
and order have been established.”
Gopalaswami Ayyangar, (Statement at the Security
Council, 15th January, 1948)
-
“The question of accession is to be decided finally in a free
plebiscite, on this there is no dispute”.
(White Paper on Kashmir issued by Government of
India, 1948)
-
My government has always taken the view that resolutions, if they are
passed, must be implemented.”
Krishna Menon, (Statement at UN General
Assembly, 5th April, 1951)
- We adhere strictly to our pledge of plebiscite in Kashmir – a pledge
made to the people because they believe in democratic government …… We don’t
regard Kashmir as a commodity to be trafficked in”.
Krishna Menon
(Press statement in London, reported in the Statesman,
New Delhi, 2nd August, 1951)
-
“The Government of India not only reaffirms its acceptance of the
principle that the question of the continuing accession of the State of Jammu
and Kashmir to India shall be decided through the democratic method of a free
and impartial plebiscite under the auspices of the United Nations, but is
anxious that the conditions necessary for such a plebiscite should be created as
quickly as possible”.
(Letter from Govt. of India to UN Representative
for India and Pakistan, 11th September, 1951)
- “We do not seek to go behind the UNCIP resolutions, or to ignore the
vital elements of principle
contained in them. ……We have always adhered to the UNCIP resolutions….. We
cannot be a party to the reversal of previous decisions taken by the United
Nations Commission with the agreement of the parties.”
Mrs. Vijay Lakshmi Pandit,(Statement at the Security Council, 8th
December, 1952)
-
“I want to say for the purpose of the record that there is nothing
that has been said on behalf of the Government of India which in the slightest
degree indicates that the Government of India or the Union of India will
dishonour any international obligations it has undertaken.”
Krishna Menon (Statement at UN Security Council,
24th January, 1957)
- “If, as a result of a plebiscite, the people decided that they did not
want to stay with India, then our duty at that time would be to adopt those
constitutional procedures which would enable us to separate that territory.”
Krishna Menon, (Statement at UN Security
Council, 8th February, 1957)
-
“The resolutions of January 17, 1948 and the resolutions of the UNICP,
the assurances given, these are all resolutions which carry a greater weight –
that is because we have accepted them, we are parties to them, whether we like
them or not.”
Krishna Menon, (Statement at UN Security
Council, 20th February, 1957)
-
“These documents (UNCIP reports) and declarations and the resolutions
of the Security Council are decisions; they are resolutions, there has been some
resolving of a question of one character or another, there has been a meeting of
minds on this question where we have committed ourselves to it.”
Krishna Menon, (Statement at the Security
Council, 9th October, 1957)
- “India believes that sovereignty rests in the people and should return
to them.”
Krishna Menon, (The Statesman, Delhi, 19th January, 1962)